Grinding in closed circuit

Previous Post
Next Post

Grinding in closed circuit




When grinding in closed circuit, the coarses pass through the mill several times. In the separator the fine particles are separated as finished product and do not return into the mill. Because of almost imme­diate removal of the fine particles from the mill, the fines are characterized by an even granulometric composition.

One pass open circuit grinding performed in long compound mills generates a large number of different particle sizes, thus a broad range of particle sizes; this also includes particle sizes which contaminate the end product.

The grinding work is performed exclusively by the mill. The separator removes only the fine particles which are already a component of the ground mill product; the separator thus improves the size reduc­ tion conditions of the grinding unit.

Closed circuit grinding plants consist of the tube mill, the elevators, the separators and the fan (see Fig. 12.1.). These auxiliary units require additional energy which amounts to 10-20 % of the mill’s energy requirement. It is hard to prove that the  separator mill requires a lower specific grinding energy. At higher Blaine numbers however, the energy require­ ment for a closed circuit grinding mill is more advan­tageous.

Fig. 12.1. shows: a. Closed circuit grinding system

  1. Open circuit grinding system

In the finish grinding process, the Blaine-number is not the only consideration; the cement must  also have a characteristic granulometric composition.

High Blaine numbers are mostly determined by the fractions of finest particles. However, the finest parti­ cle fractions alone do not effect the hardening capa­ city of the cement. In closed circuit grinding the grinding process takes place in the range of coarser particle sizes; by this means, the  grinding  of unwanted finest  particle  sizes  – which  commonly are generated when  grinding in open circuit – is being prevented. Closed circuit grinding mills gener­ ate a range of particle sizes classified as  medium­ broad to narrow. This demonstrates the superiority of the separator mill over the compound mill.

According to Borner [138], grinding mills working in closed circuit produce cement which is hydraulically more active. This means that at the same strength, cement ground in compound mills requires a finer grinding for an amount of 350 Blaine.

According to Keil [139] the mean specific surfaces for different types of cement, ground in compound mills are:

For Portland Cement 27-5 = 3100 cm2/gram

Blaine For Portland Cement 37-5 = 3500 cm2/gram

Blaine For Portland Cement 47-5  = 5200 cm2/gram Blaine

According to the statement cited above, the specific surfaces of these cement types must be the following when ground in closed circuit:

For Portland Cement 27-5  = 3100-350  =

27-50  cm2/gram  Blaine

For Portland Cement 37-5 = 3500 – 350 =

3150 cm2/gram Blaine

For Portland Cement 47-5 = 5200- 350 =

4850 cm2/gram Blaine

Using Jacob’s [106] grinding capacity curve, which correlates the specific surface and the  so-called grinding capacity factor, it is possible to determine the throughput capacity for cements with various specific surfaces (see Fig. 12.2.).

According  to  the  recent  German  Cement   Standard DIN 1164, issued in November 197-8, the former Port­ land cement strength classes of  225 or  27-5,  350, 450, and 550 kg/cm2 of compressive strength after 28 days, were divided  into  cement  strength  classes  Z 25,  Z 35, Z 45, and Z 55, i.e. the minimum  compressive  strength after  28 days  expressed  in  N/mm 2  (N   =  Newton).

Thus e.g. 45 N/mm2 equals 450 kg/cm2. In addition to minimum values, the quoted  standards  also require maximum values for 28 days compressive strengths. The maximum  values  refer  to  the  strength  classes Z 25, Z 35, and Z 45. The margin between the lower and upper strength limit is generally in the range of 20 N/mm2. The cement class Z 55 has no upper limit of the compressive  strength.

Here it may be pointed out that the minimum Blaine number for all cement types required by the German Standard is 2200, and in some exceptional cases only 2000. An upper limit of the Blaine number is not established.

Pertinent to this it may be noted that the US-ASTM Standard Specification for Portland Cement, requires a minimum Blaine number of 2800 for cement types No. I, II, IV, and V. For high early strength cement, type III, no Blaine number is quoted (Annual Book of ASTM Standards 1974, Part 13, Cement, lime, etc., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadel­ phia, Pa. 19103, USA).

With this calculation, Jacob proves the superiority of the closed circuit mill over the single pass oben cir­ cuit mill; this is most apparent when grinding high quality cements. The same opinion is expressed by Bellwinkel [140]; he says:

  1. The specific power demand of large grinding units is 10- 15 % better than that of small
  2. For higher throughputs, grinding in closed circuit with separators is
  3. When grinding cement with varying  fineness, closed  circuit  grinding  should  be  preferred because it is more The compound mill is less flexible when  changing the scope of  duties. Larger compound mills  which  are  adjusted  to grind general purpose cements, fail to grind fine cements. Changing the final particle size of a com­ pound mill requires  a  change  in the  composition of the charge of grinding media.
  4. For combined grinding of different grinding com­ ponents, the closed circuit is more

Moreover it should be noticed that:

  1. Cement ground with high circulating load con­ tains fewer ultra-fine as well as fewer coarse parti­ cles.
  2. Closed circuit grinding yields more advantageous wear
  3. Increasing circulating load when grinding cement results in high late strength; low circulating load yields high early strength

Comparison of grinding mill capacities

Building space for grinding plants

The graph in Fig. 11.4. shows the savings in invest­ ment cost when installing larger grinding units as compared with smaller grinding mills. Fig. 12.3. again graphically demonstrates building and space relation­ ship of a two-mill circuit versus a six-mill circuit of the same grinding capacity and the savings in floor space obtained with the larger mills [141].

Two grinding plants are shown: one with two 4400 HP tube mills, the other with six 1500 HP mills, both plants achieving basically the same grinding results. These two grinding circuits are drawn to the same scale and from actual plant layouts and dimensions. The  two-mill  line  requires  a  floor  space  of  963m2, whereas the six-mill circuit requires  2778 m2 of floor space; floor saving is roughly 65 % in favour of the two-mill plant. Construction volume savings are approximately 15 % lower than floor surface savings.


Survey of compound and closed circuit mills

Virtually all the cement produced in the United States is ground in closed circuit grinding mills; i.e. finished cement grinding mills with a yearly produc­ tion capacity in 1982 of approximately 104 million short tons – not to take for real cement production are closed circuit separator grinding mills. Also, almost all dry raw mills are closed circuit mills.

Of the present total of the finish mills now existing in the Federal Republic of Germany, 35 0/o are equipped with mechanical air separators; 65 0/o of the  finish mills grind the cement in single pass open circuit [142]. The yearly production capacity of all finish mills in W. Germany is 50 mill. metric tons of general pur­ pose cement. The real production in 1982 was 35 mill. metric tons of cement [141a].

At a real cement production rate of 122 mill. metric tons in 1975 in the Soviet Union, there is at present only a minimal number of finish mills of different sizes grinding cement in closed circuit. The reason closed circuit grinding mills have not succeeded (Soviet cement experts substantiate) is as follows:

  1. Complexity  of   the  machinery   of   closed   circuit grinding
  2. Frequent defects and shut-downs of the auxiliary equipment caused by its technical
  3. Lack  of   operational   experience   of   grinding   in closed
  4. Insufficient theoretical knowledge in the field of closed circuit grinding and air separation [143].

Fine grinding with small grinding media

The tendency to agglomeration causes difficulties when grinding cement clinker in open circuit to higher specific surfaces than 3000-3500 Blaine [143a]. For fine grinding in open circuit, the F. L. Smidth Co, developed a grinding system consisting of two tube mills. The principle of this grinding system, also called Minipebs-system, is shown in Fig. 12.4.

Pre-grinding to a fineness of 2500- 3000 Blaine is per­ formed in the coarse grinding mill. In the open circuit fine grinding mill, fine particles of up to 6000 Blaine can be attained [143b]. The one-compartment fine grinding mill is filled with 4- 8 mm cylpebs grinding media; because of its small size, the grinding media are called minipebs. According to the manufacturer, this fine grinding system requires less energy than for regular closed circuit grinding (see table 12.1.). To control the grinding temperature, both the coarse and the fine grinding mill, are equipped with water spray cooling. To make the minipebs finish grinding pro­ cess economically, a grinding aid -usually 200- 300 grams/t of triethanolamine- must be employed. The particle size distribution curve of the finished cement shows the same steepness as for the corresponding cement ground in closed circuit [143c]. This grinding system has already proved its usefulness in a lot of new installations [87c].

Combidan mill

Based on the good results achieved with its Minipebs mill, F. L. Smidth has developed a new  mill unit for grinding of cement clinker, called the Combidan milL

The two-compartment mill shown in Fig. 12.5. has a diameter of 4.6 m and a length of 13 m. The sizes of the grinding media in the fine grinding compartment are in the range of 16 mm down to 4 mm diameter. This results -according to the manufacturer -in a considerable improvement in the grinding economy compared with conventional grinding mills, not only in open circuit but also in closed circuit grinding.

A new-style partition wall prevents  the penetration of oversize particles into the fine grinding compart­ ment of the Combidan milL The outlet of the Combi­ dan mill is designed according to the same principles as the partition wall so that small grinding balls can­ not leave the mill together with the finished product. Fig. 12.6. shows the relation between the average weight and the grinding economy of the grinding media.

A comparative grinding of the same clinker in a con­ ventional mill and in a Combidan mill to cement of 3000 cm2/g Blaine showed that the grinding economy of a Combidan mill when grinding in open circuit was 10 % and in closed circuit 12 % better than in a con­ventional mill.

Another  comparative  closed  circuit  grinding  of clinker to high  early strength cement  of  4000  cm2/g Blaine, showed a 14% better grinding economy com­ pared to grinding of the same mill feed in a conven­ tional mill.

Besides, F. L. Smidth found that cement from the same clinker ground in a Combidan mill to the same Blaine fineness showed higher strengths than cement in a conventional mill; this relation  is  shown  in Fig. 12.7. [87c].




Previous Post
Next Post

1 thought on “Grinding in closed circuit”

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: